From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 13 6:48:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1887E37B403 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 06:48:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from itojun.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4763C4B20; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 22:48:24 +0900 (JST) To: Juan Fco Rodriguez Hervella Cc: Lista In-reply-to: jrh's message of Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:29:03 +0200. <3B274E7F.7454D577@it.uc3m.es> X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: Automatic tunneling From: itojun@iijlab.net Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 22:48:24 +0900 Message-ID: <15376.992440104@itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> My this doubt is regarding automatic tunneling. I know that freeBSd doe= >>snot support it. But i feel u can guide me in this. >> Suppose iam implementing automatic tunneling then is there a need for m= >>e to use any of the gif interfaces. RFC1933/2893 automatic tunnelling is likely to get deprecated in the near future. so if you are serious about implementing/ using it, i'd suggest looking at ISATAP instead. draft-ietf-ngtrans-isatap-01.txt itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message