From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun May 29 16:34:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2CBB5330B for ; Sun, 29 May 2016 16:34:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Received: from monday.kientzle.com (kientzle.com [142.254.26.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68BD512A8; Sun, 29 May 2016 16:34:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Received: (from root@localhost) by monday.kientzle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) id u4TGXw07046931; Sun, 29 May 2016 16:33:58 GMT (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (192.168.1.101 [192.168.1.101]) by kientzle.com with SMTP id qa8irz9ve5agnhgj2g82fevjxi; Sun, 29 May 2016 16:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: pkg chroot issues? From: Tim Kientzle In-Reply-To: <8886a4b1-492b-61ea-90ea-7e694311d03b@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 09:33:57 -0700 Cc: "bapt@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD current Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <07425DF9-AD45-49FD-AC9B-DEF39BDAA10E@kientzle.com> References: <9BC1A0E1-696D-4C00-B8C8-B57C4DB3A8EF@kientzle.com> <20160522203108.GE11189@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20160522203243.GF11189@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <8886a4b1-492b-61ea-90ea-7e694311d03b@freebsd.org> To: Julian Elischer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 16:34:06 -0000 > On May 29, 2016, at 8:55 AM, Julian Elischer = wrote: >=20 > I was thinking that in order to do this properly the chrooted child = should do all it's fetch requests etc via the non-chrooted parent, but = that would have probably been a bit too complicated. (including add = requests) How complex would it be to perform all of the fetch requests before = chroot? Tim