From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Mon Jul 1 07:28:16 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C340615D4551; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 07:28:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 699DD683C6; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 07:28:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.j.mat.cc (owncloud.cube.mat.cc [IPv6:2a01:678:4:1::228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.mat.cc", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: mat/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13400FEA7; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 07:28:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (unknown [IPv6:2a01:678:42:ffff:3e15:c2ff:fec4:452e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mat@mat.cc) by mail.j.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D567C942D81; Mon, 1 Jul 2019 07:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 09:28:14 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: "Timur I. Bakeyev" Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , Tijl Coosemans , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all , svn-ports-head Subject: Re: svn commit: r504590 - in head/net: samba46 samba47 samba48 Message-ID: <20190701072814.3ss6ellsgoixwh6r@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <201906192240.x5JMequU017187@repo.freebsd.org> <20190628070305.eim4o3d77iyti5d5@ivaldir.net> <20190629160445.051f2426@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="62qmehxggeijdels" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 699DD683C6 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.88 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.88)[-0.882,0] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 07:28:17 -0000 --62qmehxggeijdels Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 01:23:34AM +0200, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 at 22:50, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >=20 > > Le 29 juin 2019 20:40:53 GMT+02:00, "Timur I. Bakeyev" a > > =E9crit : > > >Tonight I hope to commit 4.10 port. > > > > It does not solve rhe pb, staying on the legacy libs is the solution, a= s I > > said even fedora is on the legacy > > > > > I've committed net/samba410. >=20 > My view on the situation is that all the ports, which use > devel/{talloc,tevent}, databases/tdb should keep > using them, unless they are broken by using them(but that shouldn't happe= n, > API still should remain > the same. The biggest difference is the drop of the dependency on Python2= 7, > as far as I can see. >=20 > New Samba port doesn't use external databases/ldb*, so security/sssd may > use any of those freely now. >=20 > The samba4[47] are outdated and should disappear in the middle of the > August. >=20 > The samba48 will remain for a while, but not for long, as samba411 us > pushing from behind. It'll be (hopefully) > the only consumer of the talloc1/tevent1/tdb1 ports, which should disappe= ar > together with Samba 4.8. >=20 > In general I'd prefer to see SAMBA_DEFAULT to be bumped to 410, but this = is > up to the portmgr. So, as you do not seem to be addressing the problem, what do people do when they use samba48 and other ports like freeradius3? Right now, they cannot. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --62qmehxggeijdels Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEOraXidLtEhBkQLpbOkUW81GDzkgFAl0Ztg5fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNB QjY5Nzg5RDJFRDEyMTA2NDQwQkE1QjNBNDUxNkYzNTE4M0NFNDgACgkQOkUW81GD zkh7Cw//QNVOXo3opEujm2QB7xkqPQGctHLkbcCzCR7tVnULYMXuvB4Z7ehXWBse QFq24mJYQvgwhg0ByXeoR3lMiMLVW8b6y+ElxzvzvDSf/mEqmzsxg67SB2PNwyNz +Ozoqj3+HJjKkSg2mjeYejd2/+QUbf6GFKURU7tpRpTFRgExervUcwB2iEURymrV KaxDVCpBRHK5vV5sEXzbJX8aCBtNpzaf6gyBtFIT/a4QNs2ylIYXX62SQUw+y8wo p2D45IfglPh1/FaclAy815U/fNNGUtR2A4pqJ6Clkh/G/dV0W82l1/LJlNAlbg2C 7B7RKlTrY7LnSTiUUD0DgGBsAj2+RnRxibKT4CPl/uurSkohqAvU1ZEAbYHSJNKN CebXhDflnIfBPAoN3FitBFK58nVVDRb6jTeDZfXDV6MU/ZU6FccNWjbu7n+JQOPc TRtPbhY2CUP3FX3A+AYton0IljQ8m0uu+TO00eY3CTWrysu6UvbKsoPt7MpR+z1k phdTltLsnFuWlViRPUuGFIivksTLdw1rqm5By8k6ia77cgWgavf4uX7He6nC8awl BV3A3I+eaAmlyKy6z4UW8//+Zc/ecEYVzTf+zSkZsVNo9So8AGyII+jeSjbyT/FV No39M0ytZ5+urHzkKGPJNXMiQKR/D+n0oMu/3yLJKqLYpv2EKls= =3ZuX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --62qmehxggeijdels--