From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 10 14:35:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E0D1065673 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:35:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C465F8FC0A for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2011 09:35:04 -0500 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BFR30179; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 09:35:04 -0500 Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2011 09:35:04 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20195.28183.870499.699993@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 09:35:03 -0500 To: ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <4EE270DD.2090706@FreeBSD.org> References: <20194.16432.279770.671506@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4EE256CE.4030907@FreeBSD.org> <20194.28043.813317.841751@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4EE270DD.2090706@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Subject: Re: pr# for 9->10 problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:35:06 -0000 Doug Barton writes: > >> Read /usr/ports/UPDATING? > > > > If you mean 20110928 - that identifies the problem, and > > provides workarounds, but does not name the pr. > > What are you trying to accomplish? I have some machines that I would like to update, but would prefer to hold off until a non-workaround solution is in place. (Understanding this may take some time.) I would like to see the pr(s?) so I can understand what obstacles remain and when an acceptable solution might happen. Robert Huff