Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 6 May 2006 14:25:26 -0700
From:      Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
To:        Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, pav@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: An autoconf bikeshed
Message-ID:  <C237B620-EF07-4219-A738-D70147A10229@orthanc.ca>
In-Reply-To: <m31wv7krqf.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
References:  <200605041507.08581.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <200605051346.39823.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <20060505175533.GA3384@xor.obsecurity.org> <200605051414.02384.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <1146867318.62735.9.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20060505200804.I49507@orthanc.ca> <1146907329.72215.5.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <m31wv7krqf.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On May 6, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:

> It's not like developers (all my projects like bogofilter, fetchmail,
> leafnode use autoconf and automake) were very fond of the bloat that
> auto* entails, but it's a standardized way, easy to customize at
> configure or install time and porters are rather well-acquainted  
> with it.

God forbid that anyone just write their code to the POSIX standard.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C237B620-EF07-4219-A738-D70147A10229>