From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 18 21:37:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F7016A4CE for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:37:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E8543D46 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:37:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [10.1.1.7]) (authenticated bits=0)j1ILb1wh004925 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:37:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1ILZx55062105 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:36:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1ILZxtt014411; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:35:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j1ILZweQ014410; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:35:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:35:58 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Daniel Eriksson Message-ID: <20050218213557.GB14312@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <42164189.3060100@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on cicely12.cicely.de cc: 'FreeBSD Current' Subject: Re: newfs limits? 10TB filesystem max? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:37:05 -0000 On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 09:12:49PM +0100, Daniel Eriksson wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > > I would be surprised fi you can check a 5TB filesystem > > I regularly run fsck in parallel on a 512MB machine with six UFS2 > filesystems: 1.2TB, 500GB, 4 x 250GB > > I've never noticed any shortage of memory while doing this. Each fsck instance has his own address space. If you have swap already enabled physical RAM is at most a performance thing. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de