From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 11 14:31:08 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B201544F64 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:31:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from samir.otmane@numericable.fr) Received: from smtp1.tech.numericable.fr (smtp1.tech.numericable.fr [82.216.111.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB96269DE3 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from samir.otmane@numericable.fr) Received: from mowmail-nc1.nc.sdv.fr (mowmail-nc1.tech.numericable.fr [82.216.111.101]) by smtp1.tech.numericable.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id B70DC145511; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:30:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [87.231.4.183] by webmail.numericable.fr with http webmail; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:30:58 +0100 (CET) X-EA-Auth: m5ZfLon1sEftB5CFyKExrpieSX94CJXwhNDsUnv2tlh90xAxP0+JYXbWzzw VgQWLHJILfZgbSGyLswzHnZXGC+BAB5zaWfTS From: samir.otmane@numericable.fr To: "Carmel NY" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:30:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Re: Barebone kernel options request X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: COMS/EA14.11/r20171018 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrgeeigdeigecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfpfgfogfftkfevteeunffgpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfffuffrggfokfgjtgfgsehtqhdttdertddunecuhfhrohhmpehsrghmihhrrdhothhmrghnvgesnhhumhgvrhhitggrsghlvgdrfhhrnecuffhomhgrihhnpehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhgnecukfhppeekjedrvdefuddrgedrudekfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: AB96269DE3 X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.35 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.90)[0.905,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.30)[-0.301,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[numericable.fr]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.96)[0.960,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mta.numericable.fr]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[outlook.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[37.111.216.82.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:21502, ipnet:82.216.0.0/17, country:FR]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-0.00)[country: FR(-0.01)]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[183.4.231.87.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:31:08 -0000 Not really related about hardware, i just don't like being enforced feature= s that i don't need/want of, yet i understand that there will *might* not b= e noticeable performance impact upon keeping/get rid of some features. ---- Message d'origine ---- De : "Carmel NY" =C0 : "FreeBSD" Objet : Re: Barebone kernel options request Date : 11/03/2019 14:54:48 CET On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:08:48 -0400, Robert Huff stated: >Polytropon writes: > >> You will then make a copy of the GENERIC kernel configuration file >> and adjust it to your needs, i. e., remove all the entries you do >> not need.=20 > > Proceed with caution here. > I do not know if it is currently true, but it has in the past >been the case that (e.g.) option Q depends on device F which depends >on device B; while the relationship between Q and F is documented in >the config file, the one between F and B is not. > The easy targets are disk(/RAID) drivers and network cards. >After that? Stay alert; trust no-one; keep your un-delete key handy. > > > Respectfully, > > > Robert Huff Just out of some sort of morbid curiosity, I would be interested in knowing exactly what problem the OP is trying to correct or alleviate here. If his storage, memory or whatever resources are stretched to the limit, he would be better served by purchasing a newer, more powerful machine. "You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear." --=20 Carmel _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g"