From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Mar 28 14:45:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.22.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE1F37B41C for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 14:44:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g2SMikuW485382; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:44:46 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200203282130.g2SLU8D99368@beastie.mckusick.com> References: <200203282130.g2SLU8D99368@beastie.mckusick.com> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:44:45 -0500 To: Kirk McKusick From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: UFS snapshots in current Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.3 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 1:30 PM -0800 3/28/02, Kirk McKusick wrote: >The is no chance that snapshots would move into -current. >They touch thousands of lines of code. aside: s/current/stable/ ... More useful question: what should I look at for info on using snapshots? It seems to me I should already know, but I have to admit I don't. What's worse, I think I even asked this once before... In any case, I'd like to try them out (on current) for some ideas I have. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message