From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 26 01:13:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B061065679 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF7A8FC18 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id o6Q1DNjC025993 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:13:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id o6Q1DN3A025992; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA18530; Sun, 25 Jul 10 18:07:31 PDT Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:07:35 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: marck@rinet.ru Message-Id: <4c4cdfd7.Jb6syVdaC436gUYp%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4C4BA50B.6050507@langille.org> <4C4BB672.3090109@langille.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gpart -b 34 versus gpart -b 1024 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:13:25 -0000 Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > ... sector numbers (in CHS address method) > [start] at 1 (which always suprized me ;) This goes back at least as far as soft-sectored 8" diskettes in the CP/M era. IIRC, physical sector 0 of each track contained the C number, possibly the H, and a list of the remaining sectors on the track including the size of each sector -- even within a single track the sectors did not all have to be the same size.