Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 19:06:11 -0800 From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@BSDforge.com> To: "FreeBSD Ports" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Cc: <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, "Dave Horsfall" <dave@horsfall.org> Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check Message-ID: <b5c31d01529d8c23a1b7df6561200f48@udns.ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <20171209012522.GA42506@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:25:22 -0800 <sgk@troutmask=2Eapl=2Ewashington=2Eedu> said > On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:16:54AM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: > >=20 > > > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and=20 > > > replace it with dma(1)=2E > >=20 > > There is? Is there anything else that they're going to spring on us? > >=20 >=20 > https://lists=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2017-December/018712=2Ehtm= l Thanks for the link, Steve=2E I only wish I hadn't missed/overlooked it, when it was announced=2E Grrr=2E=2E=2E I don't suppose that the (WITH|OUT)_SENDMAIL option will/can still be honor= ed? >=20 > FreeBSD use to pride itself on being a complete (unix-like) > operating system out-of-box=2E >=20 > --=20 > Steve --Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b5c31d01529d8c23a1b7df6561200f48>