From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 02:12:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3136F16A41F for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 02:12:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dopplecoder@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC59343D48 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 02:12:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dopplecoder@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z6so166387nzd for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:12:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EPliS7xtfteMAEV55AR1LxtnDNyPNbCawiL90USJ1XMgPYjsPtzNUGGLy6EjWWYN6lH0jDkCljicvJeEkozBV9SrwiIz9Qx6WWF0cGn+psqEFF5MOIX/SSD6mZgw4BPYh0t0FzltR50djLvkKufF9vrBEpLae4Xp5VVB9EuQkF4= Received: by 10.37.14.63 with SMTP id r63mr964476nzi; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:12:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.128.17 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:12:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <45d750d20508101912402e2311@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:12:36 -0400 From: Aaron Peterson To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20050811020408.GA54862@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <45d750d20508101822746c51e3@mail.gmail.com> <20050811020408.GA54862@xor.obsecurity.org> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: threading - good, bad, ugly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 02:12:37 -0000 On 8/10/05, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:22:10PM -0400, Aaron Peterson wrote: > > It used to be that lots of people told me threaded applications didn't > > run efficiently on FreeBSD because the native threading libraries were > > not very efficient. I remember some work being done on them for the > > 5.x series though, and am wondering if this is still any issue to be > > concerned about at all? MySQL performance was the thing people harped > > on the most IIRC... Anyway, I was just curious about the status of > > this. Perhaps there was never any issue and it was all talk. I > > wouldn't know :-) >=20 > Most of this discussion is only applicable to 4.x and older and does > not consider the fundamentally different thread library in 5.x, which > was rewritten to avoid the problems of the older version. >=20 > Kris Sounds like I shouldn't have any problems then since I'm all upgraded to 5.3 and 5.4 for the servers I manage. Do you know of any performance comparisons for MySQL performance between FreeBSD 5.x and other operating systems one might run MySQL on? Aaron