From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 6 21:48:34 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA08476 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 21:48:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ayukawa.aus.org (ayukawa.aus.org [199.166.246.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA08471 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 1999 21:48:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lh@aus.org) Received: from bsd.aus.org (lh@bsd.aus.org [199.166.246.189]) by ayukawa.aus.org (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA14795 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 00:29:08 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199901070529.AAA14795@ayukawa.aus.org> X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3-beta-042198 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 00:47:53 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: lh@aus.org From: Luke To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: CVS release tages for 3.0 anomaly Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I was wondering how come in the src tree theres a RELENG_3_0_0_RELEASE tag for cvs, then in the ports tree theres RELEASE_3_0_0 ? Is it on purpose? --- E-Mail: Luke Sent by XFMail ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message