From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Sep 2 14:07:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7E2BCC0EB for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 14:07:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 327D2B0F for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 14:07:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bfp7f-000F7H-9M; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 17:07:11 +0300 Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 17:07:11 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Kajetan Staszkiewicz Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 60G+ network connection Message-ID: <20160902140711.GC34394@zxy.spb.ru> References: <20160901211825.GG88122@zxy.spb.ru> <224082ab-95f5-0935-6429-7e7a612f1312@selasky.org> <20160902100203.GK88122@zxy.spb.ru> <6699041.g38mlsGLrS@energia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <6699041.g38mlsGLrS@energia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 14:07:14 -0000 On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 04:02:20PM +0200, Kajetan Staszkiewicz wrote: > On day piątek, 2 września 2016 13:02:03 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > > PS: 100G transmiters and connectiveti too expensive, 2x40G prefer. > > > > > > You can put 2x 40GBit/s modules in the CX-4. I'm not sure if you can > > > combine 2x 40GBit/s into a single 80GBit/s. > > > > I can do it by if_lagg. > > Plase note that by using link aggregation you can not achieve full speed over > a single TCP stream. Onle when multiple streams are in operation you will > really get the aggregated speed. NP, I am have more then 40K TCP stream. PS: link aggregation with round-roubin policy can achieve full speed.