From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 22 17:12:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD811065686 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:12:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raj@semihalf.com) Received: from smtp.semihalf.com (smtp.semihalf.com [213.17.239.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256848FC0A for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:12:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [213.17.239.109]) by smtp.semihalf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8117BC3835; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:52:39 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at semihalf.com Received: from smtp.semihalf.com ([213.17.239.109]) by localhost (smtp.semihalf.com [213.17.239.109]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oaDod86844ni; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:52:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.0.79] (cardhu.semihalf.com [213.17.239.108]) by smtp.semihalf.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02C85C3832; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:52:38 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Rafal Jaworowski In-Reply-To: <4D88CA8A.3020808@embedded-brains.de> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:52:38 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3AD09272-7064-4279-AFAE-6E583C49D1D2@semihalf.com> References: <4D88CA8A.3020808@embedded-brains.de> To: Sebastian Huber X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PowerPC e500v2 and IEEE 754 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:12:26 -0000 On 2011-03-22, at 17:12, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello >=20 > does anyone know if FreeBSD provides the software support for full = IEEE 754 > conformance on a PowerPC e500v2 core (for example QorIQ series from = Freescale)? Do you mean using the floating point APU in E500? We basically run with = soft floats only, either at GCC level or kernel-side FPU emulation, the = floating point APU is not utilised currently. Rafal