From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 15:49:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F01D16A4CE; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:49:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CF343D5A; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:49:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i07NnuvT065359; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:49:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i07NnuPT065358; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:49:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:49:55 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: "Daniel O'Connor" Message-ID: <20040107234955.GA65187@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200401071731.40481.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200401070818.i078IF7E015950@gw.catspoiler.org> <20040107232318.GB64718@dragon.nuxi.com> <200401081007.03430.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401081007.03430.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Don Lewis cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org cc: yurtesen@ispro.net.tr Subject: Re: FreeBSD Crashes with AMD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 23:49:58 -0000 On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:07:03AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Thursday 08 January 2004 09:53, David O'Brien wrote: > > > or so ago was very reasonably priced at the time and performs well. My > > > suspicion is that the recent lack of ECC support may be due to AMD > > > wanting to move "serious" users over to their new 64 bit architecture. > > > > No, the problem is AMD isn't updating the 761 chipset to do 333 or 400 > > FSB -- thus few want to use that chip set today. AMD is not presureing > > VIA, ALI, nVidia, etc... to not produce ECC supporting motherboards. > > Double negative? :) > > It certainly irritates the crap out of me that you can't seem to buy an ECC > board that will fit a modern Athlon in it :( There are "modern" Athlons for SMP boards: the MP 2800+ -- it is a "Barton" CPU with 512KB L2 cache. It is runs at 266FSB rather than 333 or 400 though.