From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 14 09:40:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC5337B401 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 09:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web9602.mail.yahoo.com (web9602.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.129.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC4AD43F75 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 09:40:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chancedj@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030714164035.40161.qmail@web9602.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.14.253.21] by web9602.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 09:40:35 PDT Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 09:40:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Daryl Chance To: Michael Edenfield In-Reply-To: <20030714160449.GA51675@basement.kutulu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade/make install problem. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: chancedj@yahoo.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:40:38 -0000 Thanks for the diff, I'll try it in a bit. Since the .mk file has been modified and only works with 4.8, shouldn't the pkg_install (if it can be installed without having to install other things) be merged to the RELENG_4_# branches since this .mk change breaks the ports for pretty much everyone under 4.7? It's not a security fix, but I thought I remembered seeing some changes "MFC'd" to the security branch, even when it wasn't a security issue. as for the PR, I will try that once I get home. That seems like a pretty good solution as well, I just need time to sit down and read it over and I don't have the time at work. If I install the patch and everything seems to work fine, what are the odds that it came be merged to the rest of the 4.x branches? (or at least back one minor revision to 4.6, since thats what I'm running). I know the response from some will be to just upgrade the 4.8, but atm, it's not an option :). Since --- Michael Edenfield wrote: > * Daryl Chance [030714 11:07]: > > cool. thanks for the patch and the info. Would > it be > > fine for me to sync the 4.8 source and just > install > > the pkg_install utils? (pkg_*). I know the > question > > was asked previously, but I didn't see any answer. > I > > assume that it would be fine, but I don't want to > > screw something up if I do install them. > > This would probably work. If you have the source > for your currently > running version you can try checking out just the > diff's used to MFC > the changes back to 4.7. > > (If my CVS skills are still intact, this is the diff > you want:) > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info/perform.c.diff?r1=1.29.2.11&r2=1.29.2.12 > > > PS: For some reason, yahoo has put your last 2 > (this > > and the previous email) into, basically, the spam > > folder. Very wierd. > > Likely because I'm running my own SMTP server off my > home PC at the > moment, while my real one is being rebuilt, and it's > a cable modem. > > --Mike > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com