From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 4 05:31:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CA137B401 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 05:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B52F4400E for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 05:31:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h64CVVdP002818; Fri, 4 Jul 2003 06:31:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 21:31:25 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20030704.213125.17266089.imp@bsdimp.com> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <6475.1057260276@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <6475.1057260276@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does newreno work as designed ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 12:31:47 -0000 In message: <6475.1057260276@critter.freebsd.dk> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : I'm sitting on a ISDN line right now, and I thought the newreno issues : had been solved, but by disabling newreno I get a distinctly better : web-surfing experience. : : Is newreno working as designed right now, and if not, who is fixing it ? Ditto. I've had to disable newreno on my machines as well. I have a wireless link to a DSL line, and I get much better performance when I do that. This is as true as of a few days ago kernel as it was in 4.5. Warner