From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 16 06:31:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C35816A402; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B3E13C4AC; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696371A4DCC; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:31:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 549D4517DB; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 01:31:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 01:31:42 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Alex Dupre Message-ID: <20070216063141.GA49995@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200702141652.l1EGqeZV047261@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070215095351.GA34667@FreeBSD.org> <45D4337A.8080302@FreeBSD.org> <20070215185941.GA42443@xor.obsecurity.org> <45D4D6A9.4060600@FreeBSD.org> <20070215222111.GA45309@xor.obsecurity.org> <45D54EF3.7000103@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45D54EF3.7000103@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/Subversive Makefile distinfo pkg-descr X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:31:44 -0000 On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 07:28:03AM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Why not read what the porter's handbook has to say? ;-) > > Oh, I read it, and still don't understand how XFree86 could begin with a > lower-case char ;-) (other misleading info) The statement there is that it gets an exception because it's a meta-port...although you're right that it doesn't really make sense and we should probably remove that text. > Ok, ideally we should change PORTNAME and probably a few other variables > like DISTNAME after a repocopy, then. As mentioned no repo-copy is needed here since it's a newly added port with no history. Kris