Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:46:36 +0800 From: "David Xu" <davidxu@viatech.com.cn> To: "Petri Helenius" <pete@he.iki.fi>, <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rtprio and kse Message-ID: <000b01c33fb5$a9fbd570$f001a8c0@davidw2k> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10306301817580.20764-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <007601c33fb2$6c5d2c80$f9d7473e@PETEX31>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Petri Helenius" <pete@he.iki.fi> To: <deischen@freebsd.org>; "David Xu" <davidxu@viatech.com.cn> Cc: <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 5:21 PM Subject: Re: rtprio and kse >=20 > > It is legitimate to want a single (or set) of threads to > > have real-time priority and not the others. Since the > > priority is in the KSEG, this is possible to do without > > fork()ing. > >=20 > > Dan Eischen > >=20 > So to summarize, in order to achieve rtprio for one of the ~dozen = threads > in the process, winthout affecting the rest of the threads in the same = process, > set PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM when creating the thread > and ask for rtprio in the thread after it has started? >=20 Yes, quite right. :-) > Pete > =20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-threads@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-threads-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000b01c33fb5$a9fbd570$f001a8c0>