From owner-freebsd-ports Sat May 12 21:31:48 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from femail13.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail13.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.140])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C28537B43E
for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 12 May 2001 21:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from pat@databits.net)
Received: from bsod ([24.5.63.190]) by femail13.sdc1.sfba.home.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP
id <20010513043137.OVQA570.femail13.sdc1.sfba.home.com@bsod>;
Sat, 12 May 2001 21:31:37 -0700
Message-ID: <000901c0db65$993d38c0$0200a8c0@bsod>
From: "Patrick Li" <pat@databits.net>
To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>,
<freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>
References: <XFMail.010512163006.jdp@polstra.com> <01b601c0db3c$5b02ba40$931576d8@inethouston.net> <002d01c0db41$70cdda30$0200a8c0@bsod> <01c201c0db57$7273c000$931576d8@inethouston.net> <004f01c0db59$9e6fe740$0200a8c0@bsod> <021c01c0db5a$6b946200$931576d8@inethouston.net> <20010512222441.N29602@casimir.physics.purdue.edu> <023401c0db5d$7838be40$931576d8@inethouston.net> <20010512223512.O29602@casimir.physics.purdue.edu> <023e01c0db5f$0e2d4dc0$931576d8@inethouston.net> <001f01c0db62$7bbaede0$0200a8c0@bsod> <003201c0db62$c8cba0c0$0200a8c0@bsod> <026701c0db63$14717900$931576d8@inethouston.net>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1
Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 00:31:37 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2465.0003
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2465.0003
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Well in my opinion, i think its more proper to make them samba20 and samba22
or just samba and samba22 or something along those lines. The public may or
may not agree but i guess its up to you, the maintainer, and the committers
to decide :)
Patrick Li <pat@databits.net>
----- Original Message -----
From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
To: "Patrick Li" <pat@databits.net>; <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 12:13 AM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1
> I can submit a pr to change it if you could suggest what you think it
should
> be, but it seems like everyone is very busy so it probably won't happen
> soon.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick Li" <pat@databits.net>
> To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>;
> <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 11:11 PM
> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1
>
>
> > Another thing should be changed if it remains the way it is now is
> pkg-descr
> > since both are identical
> >
> > -pat
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Patrick Li" <pat@databits.net>
> > To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>;
> > <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 12:09 AM
> > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1
> >
> >
> > > I can't agree more than what David said here. Its a fact that both are
> > > stable and is not in the development stage anymore. 2.2.0 is stable
and
> > has
> > > more features and bugs to sort out and between samba versions 2.0.9
and
> > > 2.2.0 is quite a big change. I noticed a lot more features that was
not
> > > present with 2.0.9 but 2.0.9 is still preferred by me since there are
> > still
> > > some stuff like bugs needed to be worked on in 2.2.0 and some prefer
> 2.2.0
> > > for the additional features, testing, or whatever it may be. Well
naming
> > one
> > > samba and one to samba-stable or just copy samba to samba-stable is
not
> > > technically correct since both are stable. Keeping them samba and
> > > samba-devel, well, wont also be technically be correct since both are
> not
> > in
> > > development stage anymore but another way of looking at it, keeping
> > > samba-devel to 2.2.x, some people may think that 2.2.0 still have bugs
> to
> > > fix and not as stable as 2.0.9. Hehe maybe we all should join the
> *cough*
> > > debate team. :)
> > >
> > > Patrick Li <pat@databits.net>
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
> > > To: "Will Andrews" <will@physics.purdue.edu>
> > > Cc: "Will Andrews" <will@physics.purdue.edu>; "Patrick Li"
> > > <pat@databits.net>; <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
> > > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 11:44 PM
> > > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1
> > >
> > >
> > > > I really don't care how its done, I just am waiting on someone who
can
> > do
> > > > it, do it in a way that pleases them so we can stop this thread
> already
> > :)
> > > > But I don't think it should be samba-stable, because both 2.0.9 and
> > 2.2.0
> > > > are considered stable, its just that 2.0.9 has all the known bugs
> found
> > > and
> > > > some are still popping up with 2.2.0.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Will Andrews" <will@physics.purdue.edu>
> > > > To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
> > > > Cc: "Will Andrews" <will@physics.purdue.edu>; "Patrick Li"
> > > > <pat@databits.net>; <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
> > > > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 10:35 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 10:33:25PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr.
> wrote:
> > > > > > But its not in development anymore, its like calling XFree86-4,
> > > > > > XFree86-4-devel. I wouldn't mind keeping up the -devel branch
of
> > > samba
> > > > for
> > > > > > samba 3.0, but I currently can't do that without making 2.0.9
> > > > unavailable,
> > > > > > which a few people still need access to.
> > > > >
> > > > > So repocopy samba to samba-stable and have 3 levels of samba
> support.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > wca
> > > > >
> > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message