From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 10 10:02:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9897E37B401 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 10:02:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net (flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1BC43FAF for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 10:02:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rperry4@earthlink.net) Received: from dialup-171.75.71.33.dial1.weehawken.level3.net ([171.75.71.33] helo=earthlink.net) by flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19lta8-0003f6-00; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 10:02:12 -0700 Message-ID: <3F367B0B.2090009@earthlink.net> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 13:04:11 -0400 From: Bob Perry User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030704 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kent Stewart References: <3F35002F.1060108@earthlink.net> <1060497995.17037.85.camel@daemon.home.net> <3F365CFD.9000708@earthlink.net> <200308100835.11959.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200308100835.11959.kstewart@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Portupgrade Broke? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 17:02:15 -0000 It doesn't read the tree. It uses INDEX.db, which you are supposed to >build after each cvsup of ports-all. To build INDEX.db, you need a >current version of INDEX. I get too many messages from "portsdb -U" and >use the sequence "make index" and then "portsdb -u". I run these >everytime I cvsup ports-all. The only time you can save is adding >"ports/INDEX" to your refuse file. There isn't any point in downloading >INDEX and rebuilding it immediately after cvsup finishes. > >If you have more ports in your refuse file, running portsdb -U is >probably your only choice. Make is known to stop when it hits a port >that is missing in your /usr/port fs. > > > I think I have a better understanding now of this process. It's also clear that I have to spend more time with the available documentation. Thanks to you both for taking the time to help. Bob