Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 07 Jul 2004 11:38:48 -0700
From:      Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
To:        "Gustavo A. Baratto" <gbaratto@superb.net>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   rsync (was: Re: Rewrite cvsup & portupgrade in C)
Message-ID:  <6.1.0.6.1.20040707113145.03e4ef98@popserver.sfu.ca>
In-Reply-To: <02ef01c4644e$b5f956e0$6400a8c0@chivas>
References:  <E1Bhd1M-000KEo-Nz@smp500.sitetronics.com> <200407062323.02854.kirk@strauser.com> <20040707043251.GA35651@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <200407062345.24117.kirk@strauser.com> <20040707070012.GC38356@dragon.nuxi.com> <40EC11EB.4060804@sympatico.ca> <20040707152149.GG82302@elvis.mu.org> <20040707160745.GA39557@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <02ef01c4644e$b5f956e0$6400a8c0@chivas>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:17 07/07/2004, Gustavo A. Baratto wrote:
>Rsync is another tool that should be considered going to the base system as
>well.

Given that rsync
(a) is distributed under the GPL license, and
(b) has had two serious security flaws in the past year,
I don't think we really want to import it right now (or
possibly ever).

Colin Percival




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.1.0.6.1.20040707113145.03e4ef98>