From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Oct 10 22:47:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from smtp04.primenet.com (smtp04.primenet.com [206.165.6.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5E037B502 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:47:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp04.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA01473; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:44:50 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr09.primenet.com(206.165.6.209) via SMTP by smtp04.primenet.com, id smtpdAAAwgaOTc; Tue Oct 10 22:44:42 2000 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA11724; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:47:27 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <200010110547.WAA11724@usr09.primenet.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf To: tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 05:47:27 +0000 (GMT) Cc: mbendiks@eunet.no (Marius Bendiksen), dillon@earth.backplane.com (Matt Dillon), arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200010110527.WAA10938@usr09.primenet.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Oct 11, 2000 05:27:31 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > isn't poked full of holes when someone turns inetd on without looking > > > at inetd.conf. I can't imagine why anyone would do that, I guess [ ... ] > I like the idea of an "anal" package, though... Specifically, it is exactly the sort of thing I would install _after_ I was sure everything was working in SSH-land, rather than relying on the "automatic" process not failing. People may want to consider that it is more security conscious to use an out-of-band mechanism to establish the key set, anyway. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message