From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jan 15 21:55:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA29087 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 21:55:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lsd.relcom.eu.net (ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net [193.124.23.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA29083 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 1998 21:55:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net) Received: (from ache@localhost) by lsd.relcom.eu.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA20805; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 08:54:56 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 08:54:55 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= X-Sender: ache@lsd.relcom.eu.net To: Satoshi Asami cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk patch for review In-Reply-To: <199801160503.VAA18085@bubble.didi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * Since for debugging purposes backups needed even if patch applies OK, > * and it is changed with new "patch", here is solution I plan to commit: > > Will this work fine with earlier versions of "patch" too? If so, I'll > commit it myself. No, I mean patch 2.5 only (-current), not patch 2.1 (-stable) -b works differently between this two versions. In case you want the same bsd.port.mk in both -current and -stable, some trick must be used to detect patch version, maybe 'patch --version' call or just simple -current detection, or adding PATCHFLAGS to sys.mk, etc. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/