Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 26 Nov 2020 22:08:13 -0300
From:      "Dr. Rolf Jansen" <freebsd-rj@obsigna.com>
To:        Oskar Holmlund <oskar.holmlund@yahoo.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: User Space GPIO Interrupt programming - GSoC-2018
Message-ID:  <D8BE9790-17E2-4054-883F-9C66E00D7655@obsigna.com>
In-Reply-To: <1128996050.3062382.1606356474061@mail.yahoo.com>
References:  <2B01780F-D367-48A3-A827-B479030A496D@obsigna.com> <756100520.1642116.1606251415012@mail.yahoo.com> <61B0CE7A-8F57-48BD-98D4-BE6E880E7707@obsigna.com> <1128996050.3062382.1606356474061@mail.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 25.11.2020 um 23:07 schrieb Oskar Holmlund =
<oskar.holmlund@yahoo.com>:
>=20
> >=20
> > Hello Oskar,
> >=20
> > Yes, please, I would be very interested to get hands on your code. =
And some usage instructions would be great as well.
> >
> > I guess, this would give me a jump start with said project.
> >=20
> >=20
> > Best regards
> >
> > Rolf
>=20
> Hi Rolf and Vladimir,
>=20
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251390

Hello Oskar,

I got it working. Thank you very much.

At the head of the kernel module source you noted that this has been =
inspired by the GSoC-2018 work.

That one I got working as well. Only when using the original GSoC-2018 =
code built-in to the kernel, I see hundreds of warnings "gpioc2: =
Unhandled interrupt on pin 3.=E2=80=9C, while your kernel module works =
without warnings.

Please may I ask you for some more details what is the actual difference =
between the GSoC-2018 work and your work - besides the obvious one that =
your builds a module.

Many Thanks and best regards

Rolf=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D8BE9790-17E2-4054-883F-9C66E00D7655>