From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 06:32:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB34616A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:32:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch [62.48.0.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0690A43D45 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:32:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 45475 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 14:32:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) ([62.48.0.53]) (envelope-sender ) by mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Mar 2004 14:32:13 -0000 Message-ID: <40449AED.1A4580E5@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:32:13 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce M Simpson References: <4043B6BA.B847F081@freebsd.org> <200403011507.52238.wes@softweyr.com> <20040302031625.GA4061@scylla.towardex.com> <20040302042957.GH3841@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20040302082625.GE22985@cell.sick.ru> <20040302084321.GA21729@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040302085556.GA23734@cell.sick.ru> <20040302092825.GD884@saboteur.dek.spc.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Wes Peters cc: Gleb Smirnoff cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: My planned work on networking stack X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:32:14 -0000 Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > However, not including an OSPF/BGP daemon doesn't preclude us from ensuring > that APIs which are exposed for advanced routing functionality (multipath, > etc) do the right thing across the board, are well defined, etc. > > As to the second part of your mail: That sounds like a reasonable suggestion, > I am sure Andre and others are paying attention to this and will take it on > board when an implementation is nearer. Yes, exactly! -- Andre