From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 11:27:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DB737B401 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw4.visti.net (gw4.visti.net [195.64.225.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8BA43F75 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:27:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from liberty@visti.com) Received: from acc8-108.dialup.elvisti.kiev.ua (acc8-108.dialup.elvisti.kiev.ua [195.64.228.108]) by gw4.visti.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5HIR6UC013303 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 21:27:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from liberty@visti.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 21:26:04 +0300 From: Pavel Grishin X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <2612437410.20030617212604@visti.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: hits=-4.7 required=5 X-Spam-Report: -4.70 points, 5 required; * -4.7 -- BODY: Bayesian classifier says spam probability is 20 to 30% [score: 0.2101] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.33 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Subject: Developing for highly tailored chips on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pavel Grishin List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 18:27:18 -0000 Hello, I have come across a small difficulty. I would like to develop for Motorola DSP56300 family on FreeBSD system, but unfortunately the company provides tools for Windows and HP systems only. I think that BSD would only benefit if such tools were available for it. Moreover there are many such chips for which vendors provide development tools for only one system (read - windows) whereas BSD can propose a lot more convenient environment to write programs. So may be we should have some committee which would negotiate such things with vendors (i.e. to get sources) and port tools. In my case, the FreeBSD is the cheapest system compared to the two mentioned in the beginning of this message. I think I could port tools for the DSP provided I had sources. Please cc your replies to my address below since I am not signed at this moment. Thanks, Pavel liberty @ visti.com