Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 1 Oct 1998 20:20:25 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Andrzej Bialecki <abial@nask.pl>
To:        Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
Cc:        Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: "options" for -current ...
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9810012018360.16940-100000@korin.warman.org.pl>
In-Reply-To: <19981001201026.23128@follo.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 1 Oct 1998, Eivind Eklund wrote:

> No.  Known options (ie, those that are in conf/options or the
> architecture specific options) are _not_ translated to -D<symbol> in
> -stable, nor has they been for any part of RELENG_2_2.  They were
> converted to -D in the 2.1 branch, though.  It is correct that config
> doesn't make noise about this in RELENG_2_2 - this is due to
> RELENG_2_2 having a bunch of old style options even in GENERIC.

Ah... Ok, thanks for explaining this.

Andrzej Bialecki

--------------------   ++-------++  -------------------------------------
 <abial@nask.pl>       ||PicoBSD||   FreeBSD in your pocket? Go and see:
 Research & Academic   |+-------+|       "Small & Embedded FreeBSD"
 Network in Poland     | |TT~~~| |    http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/
--------------------   ~-+==---+-+  -------------------------------------


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.02A.9810012018360.16940-100000>