From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 15 06:11:35 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5404216A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:11:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr (smtp9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.22])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7C943D53
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:11:35 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr)
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mwinf0903.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3E1041C00171
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:11:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr
	[81.50.80.3])
	by mwinf0903.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 216FA1C0016E
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:11:34 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: 20050215061134137.216FA1C0016E@mwinf0903.wanadoo.fr
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:11:33 +0100
From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <155315779.20050215071133@wanadoo.fr>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <33A6E066-7F17-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net>
References: <20050213152331.2B00E16A4D1@hub.freebsd.org>
 <F64CC038-7EEE-11D9-B357-000D93C7878E@illusionart.com>
 <1722947768.20050215023424@wanadoo.fr>
 <BD1E0D37-7EF2-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net>
 <1497115560.20050215024836@wanadoo.fr>
 <06433BF9-7EF5-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net>
 <8310509120.20050215063232@wanadoo.fr>
 <33A6E066-7F17-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:11:35 -0000

Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:

> no they did and could point out specific problems and likely
> intentional changes.

Where can I see a list of these?

> Google on this issue of Windows IE standard compliance, especially with
> CSS.  You will find reams of info with examples of where MS got it 
> wrong, and many think intentionally got it wrong.

I've already tested the browser myself, with the official test suites.
It did better than any other overall.

In any case, MSIE doesn't run on FreeBSD.

-- 
Anthony