Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 15:14:06 -0800 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@me.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> Subject: Re: RFC: Simplfying hyperthreading distinctions Message-ID: <A9BD3574-3B78-4518-8F12-60E392512703@me.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmok4rMPOq_NsSgRWfqSEKDxsPkd3SAJKFTkXvzgYpkJ7UA@mail.gmail.com> References: <1640664.8z9mx3EOQs@ralph.baldwin.cx> <CAJ-VmoknoYw-jkihmutN6qB=Piy4O73bzV50ijDaEaNvEncGpA@mail.gmail.com> <20150306215835.GB95179@zxy.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vmok4rMPOq_NsSgRWfqSEKDxsPkd3SAJKFTkXvzgYpkJ7UA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6 Mar 2015, at 14:01, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > If you're looking to ship a single image that runs on a variety of > platforms (say, you're pfsense, just say) and you want to set defaults > that say "hey, i don't mind doing some processing on SMT, but HTT is > no thanks) then how do you achieve that? Who cares? We're talking about Pentium 4 stuff. I'm with John: the = distinction should go away. If Intel comes up with a new name, we'll = just think about it when it happens. -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A9BD3574-3B78-4518-8F12-60E392512703>