From owner-freebsd-current Wed Oct 9 21: 1:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF1137B401 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 21:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63A743E42 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 21:01:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g9A41Rpk088588; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 22:01:27 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 22:01:12 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20021009.220112.82861653.imp@bsdimp.com> To: drosih@rpi.edu Cc: tlambert2@mindspring.com, FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Do we still need portmap(8)? From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: <200210072127.58523.dzerkel@columbus.rr.com> <3DA498EA.C7BF77A@mindspring.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message: Garance A Drosihn writes: : I think most of us realize that we need a solution which can be : automatically executed as part of every installworld or mergemaster : run. The debate is over the most reasonable method of doing that. My suggestion would work, and would be a viable solution, so far the only one presented in this whole silly thread. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message