From owner-freebsd-current Sun Mar 26 2:42:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from smtp01.wxs.nl (smtp01.wxs.nl [195.121.6.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5189D37B7EB; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 02:42:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asmodai@wxs.nl) Received: from daemon.ninth-circle.org ([195.121.224.48]) by smtp01.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 3.61) with ESMTP id AAA1F77; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 12:42:49 +0200 Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by daemon.ninth-circle.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA05560; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 12:42:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 12:42:43 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai To: Kris Kennaway Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fsck_msdos Message-ID: <20000326124242.B5522@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 01:41:07AM -0800 Organisation: Ninth-Circle Enterprises Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20000326 12:10], Kris Kennaway (kris@FreeBSD.org) wrote: >Does anyone object to adding NetBSD's fsck_msdos to /sbin? ISTR this has >come up several times in the past with positive feelings, but no-one >actually did the work (it compiles trivially). > >I could just as easily make it a port, depending on the consensus opinion. I am not sure. I mean, I agree it is useful, however I never had the need to use something like fsck_msdos in my past 1.5-2 years, so IMHO it would be best as port. -- Jeroen Ruigrok vd Werven/Asmodai asmodai@[wxs.nl|bart.nl|freebsd.org] Documentation nutter/C-rated Coder BSD: Technical excellence at its best The BSD Programmer's Documentation Project The descent to hell is easy... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message