From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 28 21:41:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE4E16A400 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:41:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63D443D8C for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:41:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C041A3C1D; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:40:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 90F8E51352; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:40:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:40:58 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Tom Grove Message-ID: <20060328214058.GB2682@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200603281234.11850.satyam@sklinks.com> <4429A049.8080100@voidmain.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4429A049.8080100@voidmain.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Joseph Vella , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why are so many people using 4.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:41:30 -0000 --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 03:44:57PM -0500, Tom Grove wrote: > I would certainly recommend going with 6.x. The reason that many of our= =20 > servers still run 4.x is that 5.x got a bad reputation and there really= =20 > is no upgrade path from 4.x to 6.x. 5 and 6 default to using UFS2 and 4= =20 > uses UFS so, IMHO it's better to rebuild and taking a few hundred users= =20 > offline for a couple of hours whilst this happens isn't fun. FYI, there's no reason you need to switch to UFS2 to run 6. Kris --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEKa1qWry0BWjoQKURAqfcAKCPZYY95JUwgnXchS0sL86UCS/eFQCfQTOm sBhRNczDXM0QC52WFXo88JE= =2m1E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko--