From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 21:20:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF1516A492 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:20:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0980343D46 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:20:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5NLKL3I090842 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:20:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k5NLKL3F090841; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:20:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:20:21 GMT Message-Id: <200606232120.k5NLKL3F090841@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: Subject: Re: bin/99364: df(1) command shows negative space used X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Giorgos Keramidas List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:20:22 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/99364; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Maxim Konovalov Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/99364: df(1) command shows negative space used Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 00:19:22 +0300 On 2006-06-23 19:20, Maxim Konovalov wrote: >On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, 19:10-0000, Matteo Riondato wrote: >> Synopsis: df(1) command shows negative space used >> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed >> State-Changed-By: matteo >> State-Changed-When: Fri Jun 23 19:09:23 UTC 2006 >> State-Changed-Why: >> This is expected and is the correct behaviour. >> Please read fsck(8) (look for "-m" option) and tunefs(8) >> ("-m" as well). > >Actually, it is not a correct behaviour and I fail to see how it >correlates with MINFREE: > >Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >/dev/ad0s2e 496M -36K 456M -0% /tmp > >Btw, fsck doesn't have -m key. Do you mean newfs? It looks like your /tmp filesystem needs an fsck. Can you boot in single user mode and `fsck -y /tmp'?