From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 16:53:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049C116A4CF for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:53:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from falcon.loomes.de (smtp.loomes.de [212.40.161.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBCA43D48 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:53:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markus@trippelsdorf.de) Received: from port-212-202-34-139.dynamic.qsc.de ([212.202.34.139] helo=[192.68.0.2]) by falcon.loomes.de with asmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1D6tZo-00065N-Tx; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 17:53:28 +0100 From: Markus Trippelsdorf To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" In-Reply-To: References: <200502230042.j1N0g1q79345@pobox.com> <1109139161.620.9.camel@bsd.trippelsdorf.de> <1109147585.2574.1.camel@bsd.trippelsdorf.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 17:53:27 +0100 Message-Id: <1109868807.658.3.camel@bsd.trippelsdorf.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Brian Campbell Subject: Re: skc0: no PHY found X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:53:32 -0000 On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 23:59 +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > > I'm running 4.7 and had the same problem ... my fix was, in > > > > sk_init_yukon(), just after sc is assigned, add: > > > > > > > > sk_win_write_4(sc, SK_GPIO, > > > > (sk_win_read_4(sc, SK_GPIO) | SK_GPIO_DIR9) & ~SK_GPIO_DAT9); > > > Hi Brian, > > > thank you very much. Your patch completely solved the problem. > > > IMHO it should be committed to the tree. > > > > This is the patch: > > Could you please try the patch at [1] and tell me if there are any > problems or if it just works. > > The patch is against HEAD but should also be easily applyable > to RELENG_5. > Your patch is working fine here (running HEAD). Thank you. __ Markus