From owner-cvs-all  Sat May  6  8:14:43 2000
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from t-mta2.odn.ne.jp (mfep2.odn.ne.jp [143.90.131.166])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4814A37B88F; Sat,  6 May 2000 08:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from shigeisp@pop02.odn.ne.jp)
Received: from athena.shige.org ([210.188.11.161]) by t-mta2.odn.ne.jp
          (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP
          id <20000506151430344.NOEJ.904.t-mta2.odn.ne.jp@mta2.odn.ne.jp>;
          Sun, 7 May 2000 00:14:30 +0900
To: kris@FreeBSD.org
Cc: asami@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.emacs.mk bsd.port.mk
From: Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005060532430.69390-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
References: <200005061045.DAA61204@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<Pine.BSF.4.21.0005060532430.69390-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b3 on Emacs 20.5 / Mule 4.0
 =?iso-2022-jp?B?KBskQjJWMWMbKEIp?=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 00:13:37 +0900
X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130)
Lines: 15
Message-Id: <20000506151430344.NOEJ.904.t-mta2.odn.ne.jp@mta2.odn.ne.jp>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.emacs.mk bsd.port.mk
Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 05:33:56 -0700 (PDT)

Hi.

kris> Should this be named bsd.ports.emacs.mk for consistency?

After argument at ports-jp ML, "ports" (or "port") string is redundant.
Because this file is in ${PORTSDIR}/Mk.

In this sense, I think that ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.port.mk should be
renamed to a proper filename. :)

--- shige (Shigeyuki Fukushima) <shige@FreeBSD.ORG>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message