From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 16 13:18:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DE51065671; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:18:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D186D8FC1F; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:18:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (pav@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6GDIp1Z044633; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:18:51 GMT (envelope-from pav@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m6GDIp8m044629; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:18:51 GMT (envelope-from pav) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:18:51 GMT Message-Id: <200807161318.m6GDIp8m044629@freefall.freebsd.org> To: ports@christianserving.org, pav@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, pav@FreeBSD.org From: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/125462: [MAINTAINER] mail/imapsync: update to 1.255 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:18:52 -0000 Synopsis: [MAINTAINER] mail/imapsync: update to 1.255 State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: pav State-Changed-When: Wed Jul 16 13:17:18 UTC 2008 State-Changed-Why: When you're going to build and use bundled IMAPClient, shouldn't you drop the dependency on the port? Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->pav Responsible-Changed-By: pav Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jul 16 13:17:18 UTC 2008 Responsible-Changed-Why: When you're going to build and use bundled IMAPClient, shouldn't you drop the dependency on the port? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=125462