From owner-freebsd-doc Sun Apr 7 3:56:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from rhadamanth.submonkey.net (pc4-card4-0-cust162.cdf.cable.ntl.com [80.4.14.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A814237B417 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 03:56:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from setantae by rhadamanth.submonkey.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 16uALe-000986-00; Sun, 07 Apr 2002 11:56:38 +0100 Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 11:56:38 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: Benny Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Handbook NFS Message-ID: <20020407105638.GC3018@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Benny , doc@FreeBSD.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 09:25:49PM +0000, Benny wrote: > Hello! Hi Benny, > I'm not quite sure about this but I think there is a mistake in 17.4 NFS > Documentation. > > "The following /etc/exports would be valid: > > /usr/src client > /usr/ports client > > One filesystem, /usr, has two lines specifying exports to the same host, > client. The correct format for this situation is: > > /usr/src /usr/ports client" > > Shouldn't it be "INvalid", because the state underneath is wrong?! Otherwise > it doesn't make sense, does it? Good catch. Thanks very much. > PS If I'm wrong, sorry for bothering you. Even if you had been wrong, personally I'd rather have you tell us that you perceived a problem anyway, just in case. Thanks again, Ceri -- get the cool shoe shine To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message