Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 19:11:41 -0800 From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@BSDforge.com> To: "Kurt Jaeger" <lists@opsec.eu> Cc: "FreeBSD Ports" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, "Chris H" <bsd-lists@BSDforge.com> Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check Message-ID: <b31baf3a5907410dfbe026ee4e02b67c@udns.ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <20171209015928.GW2827@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 02:59:28 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" <lists@opsec=2Eeu> said > Hi! >=20 > > > > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and= =20 > > > > replace it with dma(1)=2E >=20 > > Hmm=2E This does not come as good news to me=2E I've been working on an ant= ispam > > system that targets the use of Sendmail, >=20 > If sendmail is available via ports, wouldn't that be enough ? Thanks for the reply, Kurt=2E Perhaps=2E Haven't tried it yet (means even more work)=2E :( But hopefully=2E I thought all my work would have been more valuable, given that Sendmail was installed by default in FreeBSD=2E Disappointing, but perhaps still doabl= e=2E Time will tell=2E Thanks again, Kurt! >=20 > --=20 > pi@opsec=2Eeu +49 171 3101372 3 years to= go > !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b31baf3a5907410dfbe026ee4e02b67c>