From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 15 15:23:46 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766C116A41A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:23:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A5713C447
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:23:46 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org)
Received: from zion.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net
	[66.23.211.162]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6CF1A4D82;
	Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:23:46 -0800 (PST)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org,
 Dan Epure <gepu@iogyte.ro>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:56:34 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
References: <20071111112456.GA19354@iogyte.ro>
In-Reply-To: <20071111112456.GA19354@iogyte.ro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200711150856.34636.jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [gepu@iogyte.ro: [gepu@iogyte.ro: Re: openpty() and jail in
	RELENG_7]]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:23:46 -0000

On Sunday 11 November 2007 06:24:56 am Dan Epure wrote:
> Maybe I have better luck here:

Do you have the recent fix to unhide /dev/pts devices in the default jail
rules for devfs?

-- 
John Baldwin