From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Jun 24  9:25:18 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B2FDD37B405; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@ofug.org)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA82755;
	Sun, 24 Jun 2001 18:25:05 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des@ofug.org)
X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily
  coincide with those of any organisation or company with
  which I am or have been affiliated.
To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com>
Cc: <js43064n@pace.edu>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	<freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Kernel Panic
References: <006001c0fcc9$86301ce0$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Date: 24 Jun 2001 18:25:05 +0200
In-Reply-To: <006001c0fcc9$86301ce0$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>
Message-ID: <xzp8zih7sm6.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 22
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-questions.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-questions>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-questions>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

"Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> writes:
> That's a case I hadn't thought of - however, "local" search paths should
> generally be at the END of the user's path, not the beginning, in which case
> the system binary gets called first.

No!  Local paths should be at the beginning, so local binaries
(wrappers etc.) can ovverride system binaries.

> Both cases are bad practice, and shouldn't be present on a normal system.

Bollocks.

> I think in that situation you would have to have a swap partition that's
> smaller than the maximum amount of ram that a normal user is permitted to
> allocate - in that case the limits are set too high.

That, or the limits simply don't account for all the resources a user
can consume, as is the case with mmap().

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message