From owner-cvs-ports  Thu Apr 20 18:36:22 1995
Return-Path: cvs-ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA18918
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 18:36:22 -0700
Received: from thud.cdrom.com (thud.cdrom.com [192.216.222.13])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA18903
          ; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 18:36:11 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
	  by thud.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA22710
	  ; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 18:36:05 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.9) id SAA14232; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 18:36:02 -0700
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 18:36:02 -0700
Message-Id: <199504210136.SAA14232@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jmz@freefall.cdrom.com
CC: CVS-commiters@thud.cdrom.com, cvs-ports@thud.cdrom.com
In-reply-to: <199504210130.SAA18753@freefall.cdrom.com> (message from Jean-Marc Zucconi on Thu, 20 Apr 1995 18:30:32 -0700)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/xjewel Makefile
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Sender: cvs-ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 *  >   	@${MAKE} ${.MAKEFLAGS} fake-pkg

 * Why not move it to the ${INSTALL_COOKIE}: target in bsd.port.mk?

Yeah, this is one thing that stuck out like a sore thumb.  I didn't
want to add it to the "install" target because it will violate the
orthogonality.

I'm not sure what would be the best solution to this, and I partially
agree with Jean-Marc's point (which I think is "why let the porters
worry about such `interal' stuff?").  What do you guys think?

Satoshi