From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 13 07:05:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692F2106566C for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 07:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284528FC27 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 07:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.61.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7634A17104; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 07:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3D75psB018355; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 07:05:51 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Jeff Roberson From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:51:15 -1000." <20080412132457.W43186@desktop> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 07:05:51 +0000 Message-ID: <18354.1208070351@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: f_offset X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 07:05:54 -0000 In message <20080412132457.W43186@desktop>, Jeff Roberson writes: >It's worth discussing what posix actually guarantees for f_offset as well >as what other operating systems do. I think DWIM is quite easily defined here: concurrent access only makes sense with pwrite[v](2)/pread[v](2). The non p-prefix versions should always be serialized, because there is know way of knowing where they read/write if you don't. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.