From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 24 15:23:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB51C16A421; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 15:23:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E94A13C447; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 15:23:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E9613788; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 16:54:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 1203) id E5FB81A7D2; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 16:54:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67C41A7CD; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 16:54:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 16:54:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Andrew Pantyukhin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20070615155501.GA24337@charon.picobyte.net> <20070615164345.GE15431@soaustin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "Timur I. Bakeyev" , Shaun Amott , cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Those first lines in a port's Makefile (was: cvs commit: ports/converters/p5-WAP-wbxml Makefile ports/databases/p5-Relations Makefile ports/databases/p5-Relations-Query Makefile ports/devel/p5-Shell-Source Makefile ports/devel/p5-Test-MockTime Makefile ports/net/samba-pdbsql Makefile ports/) X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 15:23:01 -0000 On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > Another questi1on I would like to ask here is: are we > changing headers after repocopies? I always thought > that for historical purposes they should be left > unchanged, but many after-repocopy commits change > them to refer to the new maintainers. I also understood not to touch them, but looking at some of my ports such as lang/gcc43 which is the repocopy of a repocopy of a repocopy of a repocopy of a repocopy of a repocopy of a repocopy of a repocopy of a repocopy of a repocopy with basically just empty lines and that header left from the original port I doubt keeping the header intact is useful, appropriate, or actually fair to later maintainers. For example, in this case David O'Brien has contributed more to the port and over a longer period of time than the original committer, yet his name does not appear anywhere in the Makefile. Are there any objections if I remove the second to fourth lines of the port's Makefile in such a case as part of the next update? Gerald