From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 31 00:53:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55107106567F for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:53:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostsblood@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202788FC18 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:53:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghostsblood@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so226812wfg.7 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:53:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:from; bh=Db8jUrA+NG3V0RQYYKTzD9CWXyTEvGUprMM8ulCrRzM=; b=kVRlDfQ28tvmLXlZcodZ1SLyrRYW+Iqy7nx79czFeOPlEyR8OxGkk9nDVyLoMCYYIc xTn2N8NrTETWL9KyTe270WZKkAP3qesK8Wi7Vj1Pngl2/OH6sGyHGlvZFwjJJWLM5g86 Fe+yNUsr8Wk0mizbmHnZTC7i4IqXNKaLu2As4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from; b=Y+GhcnM/blEnyOJ7NfpyGayuH723hIv7aIt2oMMQIhbLZD2ztZMvSd9q9W/hQVlzxz 0WSbBgHLVlZZM042zN3DFQyUYgLnok7veeiloCJzyWXSkkNnE2LhS3jcUxvTCsIb/e39 uF6rRaQGAtKbI35HeyJqR7cGNZ2mnccXwFSNI= Received: by 10.142.148.10 with SMTP id v10mr3023968wfd.317.1217465606733; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:53:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.133? ( [210.15.215.120]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm3163310wfi.11.2008.07.30.17.53.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:53:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48910D00.4070100@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:53:20 +1000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derek Ragona References: <48906509.4000201@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730152038.0258bd38@mail.computinginnovations.com> <489103DD.2010004@gmail.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080730191952.0249ab50@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080730191952.0249ab50@mail.computinginnovations.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "ghostcorps@gmail.com" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: SCSI RAID on FreeBSD 7.0, where is the array? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:53:27 -0000 Thanks for the quick reply! I created the array in the Adaptec BIOS and confirmed it with an XP installer disk, which gave me the option to install to the array as I had named it. I have to apologise for not having the actual dmesg handy but identifies the disks much like the example below, but with Seagate disks. It does not identify any striping or make any differentiation between the discs other than the target id. . da0 at ahd0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 35074MB (71833096 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4471C) da1 at ahd0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 320.000MB/s transfers (160.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 35074MB (71833096 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4471C) Regards Derek Ragona wrote: > At 07:14 PM 7/30/2008, ghostcorps@gmail.com wrote: >> Hi Derek, >> >> As mentioned in my post, I have configured the Adaptec BIOS >> (SCSIselect/HostRAID) to create a RAID0 array. >> >> The GENERIC Kernel natively-uses the 'ahd' adapter for this card, >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ahd&sektion=4&manpath=FreeBSD+7.0-RELEASE >> >> >> dmesg does not post any errors, it recognised the card as ahd0, and >> states that da0 & da1 are on that bus. I can not post the dmesg as >> the NIC adapter needs to be patched once the OS is installed. I could >> find a USB key and copy it over if you like, but there are no errors >> to consider. >> >> Regards > > What does dmesg show for da0 and da1? > > Did you actually create the array in the Adaptec RAID BIOS? If you > did, with a stripped array I'd expect dmesg to only report da0 as the > stripped compendium of both disks. > > -Derek > > > > > >> Derek Ragona wrote: >>> At 07:56 AM 7/30/2008, >>> ghostcorps@gmail.com wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> >>>> I am fighting the following hardware: >>>> >>>> MB: ASUS p5b-plus (NON vista edition) >>>> Cpu: Core 2 duo 4600 >>>> SCSI Card: Adaptec 39320 (Unused Dell OEM bought from ebay) >>>> HDDs: 2xSeagate Cheetah 73.4 GB Ultra320 SCSI (posibly Dell OEM) >>>> >>>> Nb. The MB does not support PCI-X, but is backwards compatible to a >>>> standard PCI slot. On recommendations I have limited the throughput >>>> on the channels to 160mb. >>>> >>>> If you think any other pieces relevant let me know. >>>> >>>> >>>> I think this is probably just an issue with my not knowing wtf I'm >>>> doing, but to be optimistic lets assume the ahd module worked as >>>> there are no errors in dmesg; which device do I install to? I can >>>> not see see ahd0 in fdisk. >>>> >>>> There are alot of posts over the years reporting trouble with the >>>> Dell(Adaptec/Seagate) combiniation. The funny thing is that I am >>>> having none of these troubles; There are no panics, no dumps and no >>>> lengthy pauses. It all seems fine, until I try to select the disk >>>> to install to and I only have da0 or da1. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for your time >>> >>> Have you defined an array? >>> >>> If you create the array in the adaptec BIOS you will see one large >>> hard disk in FreeBSD. If you do not define an array in the adaptec >>> BIOS you will see the individual SCSI drives as da0, da1, etc. >>> >>> The GENERIC kernel has all the typical SCSI and RAID adapters >>> compiled in, so look at the dmesg output when you boot FreeBSD. >>> >>> -Derek >>> >>> -- >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and >>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>> believed to be clean. >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> believed to be clean. >