From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 14 14:28:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8265216A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:28:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3AE643D41 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:28:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6EERT9N064319; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 08:27:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 08:27:29 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20040714.082729.127098598.imp@bsdimp.com> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <36509.1089791989@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20040713.235559.103735764.imp@bsdimp.com> <36509.1089791989@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: barney@databus.com cc: drew@corrupt.co.nz cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CVSUP and 5.2.1 RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:28:26 -0000 In message: <36509.1089791989@critter.freebsd.dk> "Poul-Henning Kamp" writes: : In message <20040713.235559.103735764.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes: : >In message: <27296.1089757404@critter.freebsd.dk> : > "Poul-Henning Kamp" writes: : >: The correct solution is the add whatever it takes to make the world : >: target fail if it is unsafe. : > : >I've thought about only allowing it to work if kern.osreldate == : >__FreeBSD_version from src/sys/sys/param.h : : Right, that was what I was thinking about too, but it would require : us to redefine when to bump __FreeBSD_version slightly. 99.99% of the time, we bump the __FreeBSD_version often enough that 'world' will work when they are the same. It is a lot better than we have today. Warner