From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed Nov 29 9:35:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A2037B401 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:35:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA22388; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 10:35:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA17335; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 10:35:09 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate) From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14885.15948.729037.110372@nomad.yogotech.com> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 10:35:08 -0700 (MST) To: Ken Key Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Here is what IBM thinks about using FreeBSD on their newer Thinkpads In-Reply-To: <200011291710.JAA88193@sodium.cips.nokia.com> References: <200011290551.eAT5pJF28047@mass.osd.bsdi.com> <200011291710.JAA88193@sodium.cips.nokia.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I spent most of last week repeatedly converting an A21P and a T21 into > wortless bricks and back, trying to find a way to get FreeBSD running on > them. I distilled the death point to: > > - Do the install (I've used both boot0 and LILO, doesn't matter), it's > a brick - won't even get into the BIOS menu. > - Pull drive out and boot on my 600X. Fire up fdisk and change it from 165 > to something else. Do not touch MBR or anything else. > - Put drive back in (A21P and T21) and I can now get into the BIOS screens > or actually boot via boot0 or LILO into Win2K. > - Put drive back in 600x, change back to 165, back in *21 > - It is a brick. > > So, while I don't know what IBM is doing with partition type 165, > I am convinced it is a key to the boot lock-up problem for the > T21 and A21P. Now boot0 has grown from 1 to 2 sectors in length, > maybe that's what "the story inside IBM" is trying to talk about - > I don't know. Didn't Robert shrink it back to 1 sector after 4.1 was released? It would be interesting to know if the 'smaller' bootblock worked as well. (The box we're using is an A20, so it may be different from the A21 problem..) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message