From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 10 15:10:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C4416A469 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:10:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timo.schoeler@riscworks.net) Received: from relay.riscworks.net (v32231.1blu.de [88.84.154.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D2913C4E9 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:10:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timo.schoeler@riscworks.net) Received: from zoidberg.riscworks.net (f054173084.adsl.alicedsl.de [78.54.173.84]) by relay.riscworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C093136E0002 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:45:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from zoidberg.riscworks.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zoidberg.riscworks.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 031C12846A for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:45:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:45:12 +0100 From: Timo Schoeler To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080110154512.1840cb08.timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> In-Reply-To: <86bq7thhev.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <88854.1199953554@critter.freebsd.dk> <4785D9CB.5080909@gmail.com> <4785E8A0.30806@gmail.com> <20080110110052.GB10155@freebie.xs4all.nl> <4786058F.8080101@gmail.com> <86y7axhjzm.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4786223C.2040302@gmail.com> <86bq7thhev.fsf@ds4.des.no> Organization: RISCworks Environtech X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.3; amd64-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: FreeBSD's problems as seen by the BSDForen.de community X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:10:15 -0000 Thus Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav spake on Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:41:28 +0100: > "Aryeh M. Friedman" writes: > > Now to really get some flames... I think the fall of the USSR proves > > you wrong on that.... namely small groups can afford to do stuff > > this way but not large and critical projects >=20 > "The fall of the USSR proves you wrong"? That's just awesome... > Great way to get the upper hand in any debate! I'd stick it in my > sig, if I hadn't given up on sigs years ago... >=20 > DES It did fall? Didn't notice. Still builds the best fighters, best submarines, and are the only one that really can do manned space journeys. Sooooo OT. ;)