Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:37:01 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Tobias Kortkamp <tobik@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r439346 - in head/graphics: . gcolor3 Message-ID: <20170425103701.GA34695@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1493115797.1561441.955398320.57CD4CA0@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <201704242108.v3OL8oYe075398@repo.freebsd.org> <20170425011303.GB38050@FreeBSD.org> <1493115797.1561441.955398320.57CD4CA0@webmail.messagingengine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:23:17PM +0200, Tobias Kortkamp wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017, at 03:13, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 09:08:50PM +0000, Tobias Kortkamp wrote: > > > Author: tobik > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/439346 > > > > > > Log: > > > New port: graphics/gcolor3 > > > ... > > > Added: > > > head/graphics/gcolor3/ > > > ... > > > --- head/graphics/Makefile Mon Apr 24 20:23:23 2017 (r439345) > > > +++ head/graphics/Makefile Mon Apr 24 21:08:50 2017 (r439346) > > > @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ > > > SUBDIR += gbm > > > SUBDIR += gcolor > > > SUBDIR += gcolor2 > > > + SUBDIR += gcolor3 > > > > Shouldn't it had been repocopied from `graphics/gcolor2'? > > Why? It was a question; several gcolorX ports suggest that they might be related (major branches of the same codebase). If those are independent, repocopy rule probably does not apply, albeit seeing three *unrelated* foobar{1,2,3} ports is weird. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170425103701.GA34695>