From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 22 01:46:50 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA24512 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 01:46:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA24486 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 01:46:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id BAA14112; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 01:45:25 -0800 Message-Id: <199601220945.BAA14112@Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Amancio Hasty Jr." cc: Rob Mallory , freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: stanford benchmark/usenix In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 22 Jan 1996 00:05:45 PST." <199601220805.AAA02052@rah.star-gate.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1996 01:45:25 -0800 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >Do we have pentium optimized bcopy and bzero ? > >Because some of the benchmarks could clearly benefit from them. After reading the Usenix paper on OS performance on Pentium machines, I'm inclined to add optimized code to our libc. Basically, get the processor type (probably via sysctl) and use this to control which versions are called - similar to what I recently did with bzero in the kernel. ...This is fairly low priority, however, so won't likely happen for a few months. -DG David Greenman Core Team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project